1974 Ford Custom 500
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2013-01-14 21:30 |
Regroup with this? /vehicle_531840-Ford-Custom-500-1973.html |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 21:50 |
Why? One is a '73, one a '74. Oh, nd i forgot to add the 500, it's a Custom 500. -- Last edit: 2013-01-14 22:01:53 (G-MANN) |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 22:01 |
Because they still look the same (to me anyway), there's 843 cars listed for this series and it's just a 1 |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 22:08 |
OK, you are the admin, not me, so do what you're up to. But in that case, I don't get the meaning of this page. On the one side, it's appreciatete if s.o. narrows down MY and model exactly, on the other side you think it's not worth if only 1 star and want to regroup with other MY's or even delete it. In my opinion, on a database like this, you have do do it properly or let it go - I'm not a friend of doing things by halves. -- Last edit: 2013-01-14 22:12:27 (G-MANN) |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 22:12 |
Grouping cars of the same model/year range together just means the page isn't as big and the list for that model isn't as long. |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 22:17 |
I'm with you, but it ain't the same model year. Every year got it's own front fascia/grille insert. And concerning the model range, well, if you want to go that far, that would mean you have to regroup all (e.g.) Ford Sierra hatchbacks from 1983 to 1993 in 1 entry. Nonsense in my mind. |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 23:26 |
That's not what I meant. I mean for example, if you had a TV series in which a number of 1998 Lincoln Town Cars appeared in different episodes, it would be better just to have one listed and the rest listed as thumbnails in the comments, rather than an entry for each one. Particularly when each one is only 2 stars or less (ones that belong to differents could have their own pages) |
|
◊ 2013-01-14 23:37 |
I practiced that in my entries (e.g. check '73 Plymouth Fury's or Cadillac Coupe's). But a '73 MY ain't a '74 MY if ther is a difference. But i think we are on the same page now -- Last edit: 2013-01-14 23:38:07 (G-MANN) |
|
◊ 2013-01-15 17:32 |
There are probably enough really identical ones to regroup rather than focusing on this one anyway |




