[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Air Adventure to Europe; The Lincoln Lawyer; Chip hai; Трое; The Scoundrel's Wife; Dark Parasite; Kolmastoista koputus; Dear Frankie; Silent Movie; Hot Stuff; Rolls Royce Baby; 轟天皇家將; 인간실격; Jack Frusciante è uscito dal gruppo; Rebel Ridge; (more...)

1981 Imperial ASC Limousine [YS]

1981 Imperial [YS] in Cannonball Run II, Movie, 1984 IMDB

Class: Cars, Limousine — Model origin: US — Built in: CA

1981 Imperial ASC Limousine [YS]

[*][*][*][*] Vehicle used a lot by a main character or for a long time

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

no_car EE

2006-03-14 19:07

[Image: bscap00684zi.425.jpg] [Image: bscap00395fy.2192.jpg]

BeanBandit FI

2006-03-14 19:57

1981 Chrysler Imperial

antp BE

2006-03-14 20:17

Comments that were posted on the "1981 Imperial" page, that did not get a picture and so that I deleted:

Junkman wrote There was no 1981 Chrysler Imperial Limo. First of all, since 1955 it's either Chrysler, or Imperial, but not both. Where is the pic?

Junkman wrote Yes, it is a 1981-83 Imperial Limo, and no 1981 Chrysler Limo :-)

Hecubus wrote Hadn't the Imperial resumed being sold as a Chrysler by '81?

Junkman wrote Err, no. And btw. the 81-83 Imperials were available only as 2-door coupes from the factory. Limos are conversions done by outside coachmakers, I'm still researching which ones did it. I know that one was done for Frank Sinatra and the car is still with his family.

BeanBandit FI

2006-03-14 23:37

http://www.imperialclub.com/Movies/Cannonball/index.htm

truckface NO

2006-03-23 12:56

Chrysler Imperial limo.

Junkman UK

2006-03-23 12:59

Not Chrysler Imperial. Only Imperial.

truckface NO

2006-04-06 13:36

junkman wrote Not Chrysler Imperial. Only Imperial.

Then how come it has the Chrysler logo on the window post in the centre?? So it`s a custom made car, but it`s still a Chrysler.

-- Last edit: 2006-04-06 13:39:16

antp BE

2006-04-06 14:10

Some Dodge also have the Chrysler logo...

Junkman UK

2006-04-06 17:23

The Pentastar, to which you refer, was the emblem of the Chrysler Corporation. It graced all products of said corporation, regardless what brand.

truckface NO

2006-04-06 22:19

antp wrote Some Dodge also have the Chrysler logo...

So this car is just called "Imperial" regardless of the Chrysler logo?? ...Oh, and by the way, Dodge, Plymouth and Chrysler, like Viper, Valiant and LeBaron are all made by CHRYSLER.

antp BE

2006-04-06 22:21

truckface wrote
So this car is just called "Imperial" regardless of the Chrysler logo??

As said above the logo is from the Chrysler Group, not the make. Some Dodge have this logo but they are sold as Dodge...

wrenchhead US

2006-04-06 22:39

truckface wrote
So this car is just called "Imperial" regardless of the Chrysler logo?? ...Oh, and by the way, Dodge, Plymouth and Chrysler, like Viper, Valiant and LeBaron are all made by CHRYSLER.


You forgot the Neon that was sold both as a dodge and plymouth ;)

antp BE

2006-04-06 22:46

And that was sold in Belgium & France (and probably other European countries) it is "Chrysler Neon". Like "Chrysler Viper", and some others...

qwerty_86 US

2006-04-07 05:25

It's a Chrysler Imperial. The Chrysler Corp dropped the "Imperial" division after 1975. So The make is indeed Chrysler and the model is Imperial. Imperial doesn't stand alone.

truckface NO

2006-04-07 10:10

Thank you :)

truckface NO

2006-04-07 10:17

antp wrote And that was sold in Belgium & France (and probably other European countries) it is "Chrysler Neon". Like "Chrysler Viper", and some others...

Here in Norway we call it Chrysler Neon, so you`re probably right about the fact that it`s called Chrysler Neon in Europe :hello:

antp BE

2006-04-07 10:24

So Imperial or Chrysler Imperial? As Junkman said it is only Imperial, qwerty_86 said Chrysler Imperial... I do not know what to use :D

truckface NO

2006-04-07 10:35

GO CHRYSLER!, GO CHRYSLER!

stronghold EN

2006-04-07 11:20

I'd go with Chrysler Imperial too.! ;)

antp BE

2006-05-01 10:55

I wait for Junkman's comment about that...

andre1969 US

2006-06-14 18:08

The Imperial was only considered a separate marque by Chrysler from 1955-1975. What had been the '75 Imperial became the New Yorker Brougham for 1976-78, every bit as posh and luxurious, but a bit less pricey. More along the lines of an Electra Park Ave or Ninety Eight Regency than a Caddy.

In 1981, Chrysler did revive the Imperial nameplate, on a heavily modified version of the Cordoba/Mirada platform. It was meant to compete with the Eldorado and Mark VI, but at that time Chrysler was just returning from the edge of bankruptcy, and the country was in a deep recession. Not too many people were going to buy a new luxury car from a company that could easily disappear soon, so they sold poorly, being yanked from the market in 1983. For the time period, they were good looking cars, but most people looked at them as an insult to the Imperial name, and AFAIK they were actually registered as "Chrysler" Imperials. Chrysler tried bringing back the Imperial yet again around 1990, based on the Dynasty/New Yorker platform, but it was a poor seller and again, was a Chrysler Imperial. For 1994 it was replaced by the Chrysler LHS.

As for that Imperial limo used in Cannonball run, there were a few of them built, but I don't know if Chrysler actually built them or an outside source did. They were fully-finished prototypes, but not available for sale to the public. I think some of them were ultimately sold off to luxury hotels and used as limos, but I dunno about their ultimate fate.

I also recently found out that there was a limo version of the 1979-81 New Yorker. Again, this one was not officially built by Chrysler, but an outside source. I forget where I saw the picture, but it was a pretty sharp looking car. And they only built a handful.

Julian US

2007-12-02 14:54

According to The Standard Catalog of American Cars the 81 Imperial was not a seperate, premium, make as had previously been the case. The 81-83 Imperial was a premium model in the Chrysler line, just as the 90-93 model.

no1Uno US

2008-05-11 04:09

I've never seen one of these as a limo

Imperial8183 US

2008-06-15 08:43

I see there is a lot of confusion about the 81-83 IMPERIAL and it's no surprise since Chrysler was not consistent as to whether or not it was a Chrysler Imperial or IMPERIAL throughout the car's history. The 81-83 IMPERIAL is just that an IMPERIAL and not a Chrysler Imperial. The 81-83 IMPERIALs were not sold at Chrysler dealerships. Chrysler dealerships that wanted to sell IMPERIALs had to pay Chrysler $25,000 to have the rights to sell the IMPERIAL. There were roughly 5,000 Chrysler dealerships nationwide at that time and just over 400 dealerships sold IMPERIALs nationwide. Some states did not even have an IMPERIAL dealership or only had one two in the entire state. The IMPERIAL's lesser siblings the Chrysler Cordoba and the Dodge Mirada have their make badges on them Chrysler and Dodge, the IMPERIAL has just IMPERIAL badges, because that's just what it is IMPERIAL. Publications will force you to look for all IMPERIALs under Chrysler first and then IMPERIAL to make things easier, since Chrysler has never been able to make up it's mind on what the IMPERIAL is. Generally when the Chrysler Imperial was a premium Chrysler model it was really competing with Buick and Mercury, but when it was it's own marque "IMPERIAL" it was a true competitor to Cadillac and Lincoln as the 81-83 IMPERIAL truly was. The 90s Chrysler Imperials were flagship Chryslers and not it's own marque, they had Chrysler badges on them, on the trunk, and they were sold at any Chrysler dealer. The 90s Chrysler Imperial competed with the Buick Park Ave. and the Oldsmobile 98 and not really with Lincoln or Cadillac. I hope this helps clear up some of the confusion "at least for 81-83 IMPERIALs".

blk95ta US

2008-06-18 18:08

i wish i had pics of this, but there is a scene in this movie where they used a cadillac seville instead of the imperial... when Homer Lyle is dropped off on the side of the road, right after Dom says "bye lyle" you can see the taillights and rear trunk of a seville as it pulls away...the seville had the same trunk style as the imperial, but why thy chose to use one for that single scene i do not know

no1Uno US

2010-08-28 06:52

yah, I noticed that too

OnTheBottle US

2010-09-07 06:30

deleted comment

RyanTee82 US

2011-03-30 07:44

Is that an Andy Hotton car?

blue_thunder AT

2012-02-09 12:16

blk95ta wrote i wish i had pics of this, but there is a scene in this movie where they used a cadillac seville instead of the imperial... when Homer Lyle is dropped off on the side of the road, right after Dom says "bye lyle" you can see the taillights and rear trunk of a seville as it pulls away...the seville had the same trunk style as the imperial, but why thy chose to use one for that single scene i do not know


Lucky you :) After quite a time, I've seen this movie couple of days ago again and i noticed the same, that they used a Seville in two short sequences, when Homer Lyle leaves the car. Here you are (starting at about 01:10:00 in the movie).

[Image: xjsxkgbo.jpg]

[Image: yvomwnhs.jpg]

[Image: lzn7gnux.jpg]

ominusdude CA

2013-02-04 02:25

The back reminds me of Cadillac Seville

police car fan NL

2014-01-28 16:21

[Image: snap349.1.jpg] [Image: snap388.3.jpg] [Image: snap389.4.jpg] [Image: snap405.8.jpg]

[Image: snap436.6.jpg] [Image: snap437.4.jpg] [Image: snap438.4.jpg] [Image: snap440.3.jpg]

[Image: snap464.2.jpg] [Image: snap475.5.jpg]

-- Last edit: 2014-01-28 19:18:34 (walter)

police car fan NL

2014-01-28 22:59

According to the trivia at the IMDb: "The stretched Chrysler Imperial limousine (stretched by 36 inches) used by 'Burt Reynolds' was converted by ASC (American Sunroof Corporation) outside Detroit, Michigan using the front doors from a 1979-81 Dodge St. Regis sedan. This limousine was used in Reynolds previous film Sharkey's Machine and Stick. Co-star Frank Sinatra had a similar limousine converted by the same coachbuilder - which is still owned by the Sinatra family (which was confirmed by a friend of Frank Sinatra Jr. in 2006)."

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising