1994 Ford Taurus GL [DN5]

1994 Ford Taurus [DN5] in The X Files, TV Series, 1993-2002 IMDb Ep. 2.25

Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: US

1994 Ford Taurus GL [DN5]

[*][*] Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene 

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

no_car EE

◊ 2005-12-13 10:57

and...
1.01 [Image: x11ford7yx.4351.jpg] 1.02 [Image: x12t8ux.9579.jpg] 1.06 [Image: x16t5tl.3628.jpg] 1.07 [Image: x17f23me.3209.jpg]
1.10 [Image: x110f1bi.206.jpg] 1.16 [Image: x116f6py.1584.jpg] 1.17 [Image: x117f37yw.4861.jpg] 2.02 [Image: x202t3hl.3853.jpg]
2.06 [Image: x206f32lt.5158.jpg] 2.10 [Image: bscap0063ni.3080.jpg] 2.17 [Image: bscap0011fy.4161.jpg] 3.05 [Image: 305f9wj.569.jpg]
3.07 [Image: 3071qj.3200.jpg] 3.09 [Image: 309f1aw.74.jpg] 3.13 [Image: 3130ff.8624.jpg] 3.15 [Image: 315f9li.2315.jpg]

-- Last edit: 2005-12-31 15:22:50

Snookie US

◊ 2006-02-23 00:47

1994 Taurus

jettalover US

◊ 2007-09-10 09:13

Was it '94 or '95 that all trim levels of Taurus received body color door handles?

jj_john_johnny CA

◊ 2007-09-10 09:42

jettalover wrote Was it '94 or '95 that all trim levels of Taurus received body color door handles?


1994 was the first year for body color door handles

Oljoke2 DE

◊ 2010-11-12 16:16

no_car wrote and...
[/url] 1.06 [url=http://img228.imageshack.us/my.php?image=x16t5tl.jpg][Image: x16t5tl.th.jpg]


i just noticed, this car is in the wrong gallery, its a first generation Taurus.

rtsbusman1997 US

◊ 2013-01-03 00:41

I guess the pics just disappeared over the years?

Ford_Guy US

◊ 2013-01-03 00:42

Strange, those should be on our system, no?

rtsbusman1997 US

◊ 2013-01-03 00:48

Before these got converted to our system, they wern't even there as thumbnails. Imageshack most likely screwed up. Again. :mad:

Ford_Guy US

◊ 2013-01-03 00:55

I don't think so. If the pictures were lost on imageshack, then they shouldn't have been converted. At least that seems to have been the norm. It seems as if these were converted and then lost. I may be wrong though. Let's see what antp says.

-- Last edit: 2013-01-03 00:56:05

antp BE

◊ 2013-01-03 18:00

Ford_Guy you guessed more or less well: this indicates pictures missing on imcdb's server.
The pictures appearing like that are also pics that were lost by imageshack. There was a bug in the script that copied them here: when encountering a dead imageshack link, it generated invalid links like this rather than just leaving the dead imageshack link like what you can find on many other pages.
I quickly stopped the script and fixed the bug when I saw that, but left those already converted ones like that (in both cases, some day I could recover many of them from my imageshack backup).
You'll only find missing pictures like this on oldest comments (here from 2005). You should not find things like that in much newer comments (or else there is another bug).


-- Last edit: 2013-01-03 18:21:04

Ford_Guy US

◊ 2013-01-03 21:04

Good to hear, thank you for the prompt response :)

Add a comment

You must login to post comments...