Pictures provided by: sixcyl
Also known as:
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2009-02-11 21:26 |
Very nice and good film Interesting landscapes and transportation systems Wuppertal Schwebebahn N.Y.City subway,.... already tagged with graffitis New York Amsterdam The Ruhr ... at last Alice (Yella Rottländer) and her mother: Lisa Kreuzer (already seen in Radio On /movie_79773-Radio-On.html ) Aircraft in this film: http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Alice_in_den_St%C3%A4dten -- Last edit: 2010-11-30 19:16:45 |
◊ 2009-02-11 21:38 |
Interesting pics indeed. Only one thing worry me sixcyl, though it is maybe not my business. I see that last time your pics are much smaller than in the past (but I bet that you still use the DVD as source). Why? You have changed some software? |
◊ 2009-02-11 21:44 |
Indeed, 2 months ago (around), I've changed the resizing of the pictures (downsizing to 520 x400 ) in order to take less space on the database... I think this size is good enough for a correct result, don't you think? ..and yes, i confirm always using DVD |
◊ 2009-02-11 22:02 |
I see your point of view. Yes in the new size still everything is well visible, but I must admit that I'll miss a bit those fullsize pics. |
◊ 2009-02-11 22:59 |
Ahh, that's a place best known as the IRT Flushing Line. Not sure which station, although I've got a guess or two. Unless EL-AL and L'Avianca also stopped at LaGuardia Airport, it probably is. |
◊ 2009-02-12 10:51 |
That's useless... since the pictures are not stored in the database Only comments and vehicle info are in database. Pictures are just stored as files on the disk, whose limits are further than the database limits (but there are still limits). It makes background cars even more background Note that for 4:3 pictures, downsizing is good, but these are too small: I usually recommend 640x480 for such pictures. Since these are often older movies, with lower picture quality, the full 720x540 size is not useful and makes big files. -- Last edit: 2009-02-12 10:55:01 |
◊ 2009-02-12 21:52 |
binmerdalors...! moi pas comprendo, si ça sert à rien de passer en 550x400 , j'va donc reviendre en full 720x540 alors? ... et pourquoi ça ferait des "big files" ? ... tu dis une chose et son contraire? ou j'comprends rien? ... (c'est sûrement ça) |
◊ 2009-02-13 19:35 |
Benh parce que justement pour du 4:3 c'est bien de réduire, mais pas de réduire autant. 640x480 pour le 4:3, 720x... pour les images 16/9 et au-dessus. Et je dis que ça ne sert à rien pour la base de données, mais l'espace-disque n'est pas pour autant à gaspiller. -- Last edit: 2009-02-13 19:35:37 |