Abduction, Movie, 2011
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Where to find this title?
Comments about this movie
See all comments about this movie and its vehicles
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2011-04-26 03:29 |
![[Image: 16.1.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0ib/16.1.jpg) |
|
◊ 2011-04-26 03:29 |
Captures are from the HD theatrical trailer. |
|
◊ 2011-04-26 04:01 |
Product placement from BMW and... Apple. ![[:kiki]](https://imcdb.opencommunity.be/images/smileys/kiki.gif "[:kiki]") ![[Image: 3.8.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0ib/3.8.jpg) |
|
◊ 2011-04-26 04:57 |
At least they were not using iPads.  |
|
◊ 2011-04-26 11:25 |
And don't drive BMW  |
|
◊ 2011-04-26 14:10 |
 I guess there is one for Internet Movie Laptop Database |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 21:51 |
Currently taking HD shots for this film! |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 22:21 |
And I'll add the missing ones after that, also in HD (or is it only in series that you miss half of the cars?  ) |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:08 |
I tripled checked to make sure I got every car .gif ";)") I only excluded two cars, a E-Series Ford scene through trainstation doors, and a Impala due to the fact their was millions seen already... |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:09 |
That's no reason to exclude them if they're visible enough. You can't just pick and choose what you add |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:14 |
But in the IMCDB rules it says not to add cars seen through a window or mirror... I assumed glass door had the same rules, I took the captures so I will add them but... |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:33 |
 read the rules again...-- Last edit: 2011-12-26 23:33:11 |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:44 |
From The FAQ Section "Do not post pictures of background vehicles that are blurred or obstructed" About The E-Series And "Similar background vehicles in a movie should be posted as thumbnails in the comments section of the movie." About the Impala. |
|
◊ 2011-12-26 23:59 |
For Reference Here Are The Two Extra Impala's and E-Series.![[Image: screenshot20111226at224.th.png]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/233/screenshot20111226at224.png/ "http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/4615/screenshot20111226at224.th.png") ![[Image: screenshot20111226at224.th.png]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/607/screenshot20111226at224.png/ "http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/4615/screenshot20111226at224.th.png") ![[Image: screenshot20111226at224.th.png]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/859/screenshot20111226at224.png/ "http://img859.imageshack.us/img859/4615/screenshot20111226at224.th.png") |
|
◊ 2012-03-28 18:26 |
![[Image: abd_000127_t.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/2/abd_000127_t.jpg) I replaced pictures by real HD ones, those previously uploaded didn't seem so sharp for HD. Moreover, the shots uploaded here above look more like enlarged divx from the size they are (why only 800 pixels?). A train: ![[Image: abd_010229_c44.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/2/abd_010229_c44.jpg) Seriously? I added three vehicles with a role that you missed: /vehicle_488611-Chevrolet-Camaro.html Link to "/vehicle_488613-Bentley-Continental-Flying-Spur-200" /vehicle_488614.html + the Impala that you mentioned above: One has a role (and better view: /vehicle_488620-Chevrolet-Impala-2006.html) The other one is that one: /vehicle_461551-Chevrolet-Impala-2010.html The Ford however was indeed not really worth listing |
