An Esteemed Movie Critic wrote

“Now follow this attentively. One Two, Handsome Bob and Mumbles ... borrow $7 million from Cole to buy some land. Cole secretly owns the land and won’t sell it to them, and arranges to steal the money back and demands to be paid. So he has the money and still has his land. Ken Lay would be proud.
But that’s the simple part.”

So much for following things attentively. I don't know about Ken Lay, but somebody would certainly be proud to get so many things wrong in so little space:
1. Handsome Bob doesn't do any borrowing since he's not even present.
2. The property is valued at 5 million (pounds, not dollars), so why would they borrow 7 million (pounds, not dollars) to buy it?
3. At no point is it suggested that Cole owns that property. What he owns is the city councillor who can facilitate the planning permission.
4. As One Two and Mumbles are "f*cked" because Cole makes sure they don't get the planning permission, they have obviously paid for the property and as such could not have had the money stolen from them by Cole (or anybody else for that matter).
5. On account of his loan and lack of the planning permission, Cole takes the ownership of the property and leaves the two guys 2 million in debt to him.

And that was the simple part! Whatever will he say when things get convoluted? Let's see:

An Esteemed Movie Critic wrote

“Now Uri pays Cole $7 million to put the fix in on his own swath deal through Cole’s tame London councilman, offering Cole his “good luck painting” as security. The femme fatale, Uri’s accountant, sees a way to sidetrack the money herself. She hires One Two and Mumbles to steal Cole’s $7 million, which she doesn’t know was briefly their $7 million, from which they can pay $2 million to Cole and he won’t kill them, but they lose the money and Cole doesn’t have the $7 million to pay Uri, and meanwhile, the invaluable “Good Luck” painting has been stolen, so at this point I’m not sure who has the money, maybe the femme fatale, but Cole needs it to give Uri, and Uri desperately needs it for harrowing reasons of his own, and the councilman needs it to save his career.
Uri may not give a damn about his priceless painting but Cole doesn’t know that...”

1. Uri doesn't pay Cole anything since the money is stolen before he can do it.
2. One Two and Mumbles steal Uri's 7 million (euros, not dollars), not Cole's. The money may be meant for Cole, but it's not his when it's stolen.
3. The money was never One Two and Mumbles' as they never had 7 million to begin with.
4. They do not lose the money because they use it to pay their debt to Cole and get him off their backs.
5. It's Uri who has to pay Cole 7 million (euros, not dollars), not the other way around!
6. Cole needs to give Uri the painting (and the planning permission), not the money.
7. Uri's "harrowing" reason for needing the money is to get the planning permission for his project from Cole.
8. Uri breaks Cole's leg in four places to make him understand he wants his painting back. Does that really sound like he doesn't give a damn about it?

Sigh.