[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

The Land of Rhodes; El Ángel; Cherished Memories: A Gift to Remember 2; A Storybook Christmas; A Shoe Addict's Christmas; Whiskey on the Rocks; Santa Claus Versus the Zombies; Ashes; Santa Claus; A Christmas Reunion; Thelma; Moj rođak sa sela; El latigo contra las momias asesinas; Christmas Eve; A Christmas Story; (more...)

1998 Ford Crown Victoria

1998 Ford Crown Victoria in Take Me Home, Movie, 2011 IMDB

Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: US — Built in: CA

1998 Ford Crown Victoria

Pos: 00:19:57 [*][*][*][*][*] The vehicle is part of the movie

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

antp BE

2012-05-31 17:34

[Image: tmh_000112_c28.jpg] [Image: tmh_000610_c39.jpg] [Image: tmh_000657_c44.jpg] [Image: tmh_000659_c49.jpg] [Image: tmh_000731_c40.jpg] [Image: tmh_000733_c35.jpg] [Image: tmh_001025_c36.jpg] [Image: tmh_001153_c10.jpg] [Image: tmh_001331_c21.jpg] [Image: tmh_001518_c18.jpg] [Image: tmh_002234_c37.jpg] [Image: tmh_003453_c28.jpg] [Image: tmh_003731_c15.jpg] [Image: tmh_003857_c03.jpg] [Image: tmh_003942_c02.jpg] [Image: tmh_005346_c59.jpg] [Image: tmh_005350_c17.jpg]

-- Last edit: 2012-05-31 17:36:03

Ingo DE

2012-05-31 18:57

On the 8th thumbnail, is it the Queens Midtown Tunnel?

rtsbusman1997 US

2012-05-31 23:21

1998 model? Also a [P71]?

Phil Leon DE

2012-06-01 02:07

My comment to this car is gone...? Anyway, I wrote that I think it's a '98 Crown Victoria. Due the holes in the bumpers it could be a former police car.

Benfolio US

2012-06-01 02:58

Not a P71. "Wood" dash and lack of spotlight hole.

Also, does this thing have CNG-model rear springs? Yikes, its got some rake to it. :D

Neptune US

2012-06-01 03:47

benfolio wrote Not a P71. "Wood" dash...


Not doubting your assessment, but don’t get too comfortable identifying a vehicle by it's "interior". Movie productions often use multiple versions of the same vehicle, so the interior you see, may not be from the vehicle used to film the exterior or "beauty" shots. Its easy to believe its the same vehicle, as that’s what the film makers want you to believe.

Benfolio US

2012-06-01 05:45

I'm not, just pointing out another clue of the model of CV. "Holes in the bumper" was used to suggest it could be a former police car, i just suggested two ways it is not.

Ford_Guy US

2012-06-01 07:47

It's a 1998 model, that's all that can really be said with absolute certainty.

antp BE

2012-06-01 11:46

With a door frame you identify that one as a 2005: /vehicle.php?id=505759
but here with 17 pictures you can't tell more than the year? I am disappointed :p ;)

-- Last edit: 2012-06-01 11:46:31

Ford_Guy US

2012-06-01 15:34

:lol: Was the speedometer visible? If I could see it, then I could tell if it's a [P71] or not.

Ingo DE

2012-06-01 23:23

My suggestion is, not to be too exaggerated with these details. It's more than doubtful, that this car is just widely still in original condition. As I told before, absolutely NONE of the Crown Vic taxis, I've spotted in Manhattan two weeks ago, was still in original, unrepaired condition. And I've seen, how hastily damaged taxis where thrown together again in the specialised garages in Hells Kitchen. Noone there takes care about originality. The same goes for the the several black Grand Marquis'es, used by limo- and shuttle services. So better don't latch to the outer body parts for a correct identification.

Phil Leon DE

2012-06-02 04:25

@benfolio: Not every police car has a spotlight, so it could be a former police car. The holes in the bumpers could be from a pushbar.
But at least we absolutely know that this one is a 1998 Crown Vic.
@Ford Guy: Take a look at the 5th picture, there is a bit of the speedometer visible.

Benfolio US

2012-06-02 06:27

Too dingy to see if its got a "certified calibration" mark on it.

It does seem to point that the lack of spotlight AND the dash trim (which also includes a clock) cancel out part of that possibility of it beginning its life as a police car. Yes, the bumpers may have come off of one, but then again many taxis have push bumpers added on their own.
Seeing the VIN is the only way to know for sure, so we can only go on the clues given.

Ford_Guy US

2012-06-02 10:32

I pretty much agree with benfolio. The dash trim is what's throwing me off a bit. Either way, I'm not sweating it too much.

@ingo: I depend on the smaller details on a case-by-case basis. In this case, I'm not going to waste a while trying to figure out what the exact VIN might be. By all indications it's a 1998 model and I'm leaving it at that.

Phil Leon DE

2012-06-02 14:56

Okay, you've won, I give it up - I have nothing more to offer. Leave it as it is. I think with these very different details it's very hard to tell if it's a police car or a taxi or something.

Ford_Guy US

2012-06-02 19:41

What are you talking about? Can't you see that I agree with you? Everything you said was spot-on in your last post and we were all in agreement that it's a 1998 model. About the 5th thumbnail, you can't see the actual speedometer so that doesn't really help.

Phil Leon DE

2012-06-02 23:27

Now I am very confused about this car.

Oldsmobile_85 RU

2014-07-03 12:06

It's a former NYC Taxi. It's a 1998 P72. It has a rooflight switch of the left side of the steering wheel, you can see it on the first screenshot, also handles on rear doors panels and has a traces of a rubber bumper protectors on rear and front bumpers. Hole in the hood lid, left by a medallion. Holes in front and rear bumper is left by bumper guards, not by a pushbumper. Believe me. I collecting info, about a NYC Taxi, many years.

[Image: 46363634.jpg] [Image: 53634534.jpg] [Image: 5345345222.jpg]
[Image: 46753635.jpg] [Image: 545636333.jpg][Image: tmh_003942_c02.jpg]


-- Last edit: 2014-07-03 20:39:37

G-MANN UK

2014-07-03 13:00

Oldsmobile_85 wrote [Image: tmh_003942_c02.jpg]


We don't need you putting up doodles of penises, we don't want to lose our Google Ads funding again :p

Oldsmobile_85 RU

2014-07-03 13:02

G-MANN wrote

We don't need you putting up doodles of penises, we don't want to lose our Google Ads funding again :p

Very funny )))

antp BE

2014-07-03 13:27

G-MANN wrote we don't want to lose our Google Ads funding again :p

We didn't recover it yet, current ads are from another company, which pays much less

rjluna2 US

2014-07-03 13:34

G-MANN wrote We don't need you putting up doodles of penises, we don't want to lose our Google Ads funding again :p

[:rofl]

dsl SX

2014-07-06 04:50

Are Willys jeeps allowed??

Gamer DE

2014-11-14 13:54

And Daihatsu Nakeds?

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising