Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2014-06-02 01:07 |
![]() |
◊ 2019-05-31 20:57 |
2009-10 by the badge placement. 2008 didn't have the rear Chrysler badge: 2008 - http://gtcarlot.com/colors/car/1248881-6.html 2009 - http://gtcarlot.com/colors/car/10490400-6.html |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:07 |
I just checked a lot of 2008/2009 models and it does appear you are correct. Future reference when comparing badges; try and use the same trim level ![]() Sometimes with different trim levels they move the badges around (Ford Escape 2008-2012 comes to mind with the Hybrid & V6 badge moving). It does not seem this is the case. I will wait for other admins to chime in on this change before I go and change the lot of them. It might be better (if there are a lot of them) to get a list of the URLs and post a mass batch in the forum here: Link to "imcdb.opencommunity.be" |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:08 |
I'll post them on the forum then. Of course, I'll stick to the same trim level. |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:14 |
No worries. It is just causing the Admins headaches when they log in and see the entire comments page with your name on it ![]() That does not mean you cannot post in the comments but if you are copying and pasting the same comment like a dozen times or more kind of defeats the purpose and it may get lost in the comment section. The reason I am not mass applying or asking antp to mass apply the chassis codes is because I want to make sure they were originally listed properly and while I am at it I am adding the chassis. I would normally only ask if it was a new chassis; i.e we found out the 1992-1995 Taurus was [XXX], found out a certain market has a different name (mexican cheyenne), or most recently (doesn't apply really in the US) the MK number for a group of cars. |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:16 |
I should do that with the Dakota and the other changes I commented on. I wondered why they weren't getting changed. Thanks for letting me know, I'll just post them there to make things easier. |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:27 |
Oh, yeah most certainly for mass changes like that. It also takes time for the admins to verify your/anyone's findings. I never change anything until I know for certain what it posted is accurate. For the Dodge Dakota instance I have never really looked at them in depth so that is why I left them go. So it could also be that none of the admins have had time to validate new findings to ID models. I know it took months until the 2008-2012 Ford Escapes were updated when I found out the hatch had a handle added in 2010. I also remember in the past with the Ford Explorer Sport Tracs I found the badge placement changed and I had to private message baube on the forum as I did not know at the time to post in the mass change thread I linked you. I highly doubt anyone is snubbing your posts on purpose it just seems when the volume is that much it gets buried in the comment pages ![]() |
◊ 2019-05-31 21:44 |
I’ll try to keep it at a minimum. I’ve been a little more active than usual and since im not an admin, I try to make sure they get noticed just so they don’t get lost. |
◊ 2019-06-04 11:15 |
Now I understand the comments on Link to "imcdb.opencommunity.be" For change requests there, you have to either explicitly say what has to be changed to what, with which criteria, or provide a list of page addresses to update. |