Pictures provided by: Neptune, SPcamert, antp, carfan, JBan717, shlc647, Andrew555
Also known as:
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2007-09-01 23:16 |
-- Last edit: 2007-09-01 23:16:58 |
◊ 2007-10-20 05:25 |
Some info on the film: All of the websites below are confirmed to be related to this movie in some way. It is said that these corporate websites and personal web pages have hidden clues about the film, including the film’s name which has so far been kept a secret. Followers of the film have been participating in the online scavenger hunt. www.1-18-08.com www.tagruato.jp www.slusho.jp www.jamieandteddy.com (Password: jllovesth) http://www.myspace.com/robbyhawkins http://www.myspace.com/jamielascano http://tinyurl.com/2ougbe http://tinyurl.com/395fgh http://tinyurl.com/2mnz4s http://tinyurl.com/36guse http://tinyurl.com/3cufod If you click on the 'Myspace' pages you will find that they belong to characters of the film, most of which are seen in the Teaser Trailer. One of the actors is seen wearing a "Slusho" T-shirt and Slusho is a subsidiary of "Tagruato". Both companies are apparently fictitious, and also some parts of the Tagruato Corporation main website do not work. |
◊ 2007-11-25 22:55 |
|
◊ 2007-11-25 22:56 |
"Formerly known as Central Park" ... (!) ... ? -- Last edit: 2007-11-25 22:57:12 |
◊ 2007-11-25 23:14 |
The film sounds interesting, in a 'Blair Witch Project meets Godzilla' sort of way. |
◊ 2007-11-25 23:30 |
I’m just afraid they are going to use that "shaky-cam" effect the whole way though the film. Its neat the first few seconds, but gets old real fast. |
◊ 2007-11-25 23:31 |
I agree. As for the issue with the tank, we should leave it as "unknown" until we can get that verified, IMO. |
◊ 2008-01-21 05:51 |
watch the movie to find out what this means because i only tell pople waiting on line to buy there movie ticket the ending of the movie -- Last edit: 2008-01-21 05:51:31 |
◊ 2008-01-21 06:02 |
My sister who saw this movie got a headache because there was so much shacking from the camera. |
◊ 2008-01-21 08:04 |
I bet you've been chased out of a few parking lots eh? |
◊ 2008-01-21 12:49 |
I'm afraid this is going to be filmed in a similar for not sayign the same way as REC, just with a camera during the whole movie and yes, a bit hacky in most of the bits. Though i saw the trailer when i went to see I Am Legend and i liked it, so another movie i'd like to watch. -- Last edit: 2008-01-21 12:51:59 |
◊ 2008-01-24 00:55 |
I think the black station wagon is passat wagon. I recognise the antenna and the chrome trim around the windows -- Last edit: 2008-01-24 01:05:05 |
◊ 2008-02-06 13:17 |
Just saw it two days ago, it wasnt bad, the plot perhaps a bit simple, it didnt got me astouned, it was ok to pass the evening, but it could have been better, and some of the character reactions after certain ituations was not very believeable in my opinion but well... Just a note, at the begining you see an apartment with views towards Central Park that... |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:29 |
somebody told me he didn't like the shaky cam effects of the bourne car chases. But the shaky cam stuff in this movie is very annoying.. at least in the trailer |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:32 |
Actually this has been the first movie i got out feeling sick of, i resisted until the end but i drunk a lot of Fanta plus the shacky cam so i almost threw up, thank God the film finished on time the shacky cam was really annoying in this one yeap. |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:35 |
Thanks for your answer. I think it's ok to use shaky cams for short car chases but using it a whole movie... |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:39 |
Well and for chases rather not in my opinion!! and in the many others, its quite annoying as well |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:52 |
Ok you're right anyway, was there at least some good car action in Cloverfield? |
◊ 2008-03-28 21:55 |
None im afraid, actually i cannot say it 100% sure but appart from that tank no vehicles deserves any star rating. |
◊ 2008-03-29 00:25 |
Indeed. Same for close shots. Two downsides of Bourne Supremacy chase. |
◊ 2008-04-07 00:37 |
saw it today in theatre - quite good movie actually |
◊ 2008-04-18 18:38 |
Here are the cameras they used while filming this movie according to IMDB. Panasonic AG-HSC1U http://www.image-acquire.com/AG-HSC1U_vanity-thumb.jpg Panasonic AG-HVX200 http://www.digitalcamcordernews.com/posts/2006/03/114180298560.jpg Sony CineAlta F23 http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/images/images_issue103/resources103pdp_1.jpg Thomson VIPER FilmStream Camera http://www.pixelmonger.com/hd_assets/viper2.jpg |
◊ 2008-04-18 19:03 |
I want them |
◊ 2008-04-25 14:48 |
I was looking forward to seeing this movie, but after viewing .. wish I hadn't.! It's Terrible, Definately among the worst movies i've ever seen. The first 20 minutes or so you get the shaky-cam/home recording treatment at a party and it just goe's down hill from there.! All you get for the remainder of the movie is even more shaky-cam, pictures of peoples feet, legs , the floor, the ceiling, lots of dust, smoke, things collapsing etc.. (All 'out of focus' or in sweeping panning shots.!) Awful! You don't see much of the big creature (It didn't impress me, give me Godzilla any day ..the japanese version that is.!) The smaller creatures (insect like) reminded me of 'Starship troopers' ..anyway they had very little screentime in the dark.! I was glad to get to the end of this movie.! Total Rubbish: 0/10 |
◊ 2008-04-25 15:38 |
I didnt find it terrible but not very good as i said above, its ok to pass the evening btu that was all, the shacky cam was horrible, the first movie to ever make me feel sick in the cinema, very bad indeed. |
◊ 2008-04-25 18:27 |
the critics were gushing about how great this movie is - but considering its so horribly unoriginal i haven't bothered seeing it - just aswell |
◊ 2008-06-04 02:19 |
Now their making another movie like it with zombies in a building, and a hazmat team trying to investigate the problem. It seems like a new fad has started in Hollywood... Grrrr! -- Last edit: 2008-06-04 02:19:13 |
◊ 2008-06-04 02:24 |
The one you are talking about is going to be an american remake of this Spanish movie /movie.php?id=1038988 -- Last edit: 2008-06-04 02:25:29 |
◊ 2008-06-04 05:04 |
The problem with the shaky cam is that so many people now own and use miniaturized cameras in cell phones and the like. Shooting an entire picture to appear like a series of captures from these personal devices yields greater realism to those familiar with the devices on an everyday basis. For the rest of us, it comes off as unmasterful rubbish by a community college film class. |
◊ 2008-06-04 05:08 |
Comments to be moved to forum topic "Why Cloverfield Sucks"--just kidding |
◊ 2008-06-13 23:35 |
I replaced some pictures by better ones, and added few. I found the movie good actually, that "shaky cam" effect is not as bad as I was expecting. But I hope that this won't become too common in new movies... |
◊ 2008-06-14 02:53 |
I still see no listing for Crown Victoria, of which there were many... |
◊ 2008-06-14 06:10 |
None were probably seen too well to give a page to. |
◊ 2008-06-14 16:38 |
Indeed, there were few yellow taxis in background but that's normal for a movie set in NY. None was visible enough to be listed I think. Well, maybe a good shot could be found, but as the camera moves a lot it may be difficult to find. |
◊ 2008-06-15 02:01 |
Who sent the pictures of the Dodge Ram van and the Mercedes CLK? If they were sent in an email with no name it may have from been me. I forgot to give my username that i have on this site. There were also pictures of a Dodge Durango, Ford Focus, Jeep Liberty, and a Chevrolet Lumina in that email. -- Last edit: 2008-06-15 02:03:21 |
◊ 2008-06-15 17:18 |
I just added them yesterday from captures that I made, they were not listed previously. The e-mail that you sent hasn't been processed yet, I did not see it before adding my pics (but it is well in the inbox, waiting). -- Last edit: 2008-06-15 17:18:29 |
◊ 2008-06-15 22:44 |
Okay. I emailed the pictures because something seems to be wrong with imageshack. I can't login even after creating a new account. |
◊ 2008-07-15 20:37 |
What about this one? This is a British FV433 Abbot self-propelled gun, which is apparently meant to be an American M109 in the film (a lot of people on other message boards I've visited seem to be mistaking it for an M109, which indicates that it did the job!) |
◊ 2019-10-31 23:44 |
Done with Blu Ray captures and added some missing vehicles. One of the best films of the last (almost) 20 years. I do remember the how much people were hyping it up back then, and it exceeded expectations. Despite the "shaky cam" that is prevalent in these found footage style films. |
◊ 2019-11-10 23:01 |
Can't believe it's already been nearly 12 years when this movie was first released, it stills feels like yesterday when people were hyping about it. |
◊ 2020-04-22 01:15 |
The automotive landscape has changed a lot within that time. I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the cars shown on this page are destroyed now. |