1951 Humber Pullman MkIII
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2009-04-06 10:28 |
pullman? |
|
◊ 2009-04-06 11:03 |
Probably, yes. Might be the less common Imperial (no limousine division). |
|
◊ 2009-04-07 04:29 |
note the rectangular side lamp, this is a post 1950 Pullman it would either be a Mk III 50/52 or Mk IV 53/54 The most significant difference between a Mk III and a Mk IV is an increase in engine capacity from 4086 c.c. to 4139 c.c.. Chris40 is right. Quite curiously, the name Pullman was used for the model with a division designed to be chauffeur driven while the more glamorous name of Imperial was used for the owner driver model without a division. Threre does not seem to be any external distinguishing features between a Pullman and an Imperial. Since Imperials were much rarer, I think we can call this a Pullman -- Last edit: 2009-04-07 04:32:17 |
