1985 Pontiac Firefly [SA310]
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2008-06-02 18:27 |
![]() |
|
◊ 2008-06-02 19:05 |
It's a 1st series (1985-88) Pontiac Firefly ,a rebadged Suzuki Swift: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_Firefly |
|
◊ 2012-06-14 18:13 |
What an ugly car ![]() |
|
◊ 2012-06-14 18:24 |
Nice ![]() |
|
◊ 2012-06-14 20:12 |
But popular in your home country: /vehicle_402060-Suzuki-Swift-1990.html Really popular to be precise, as you can see them in NL more often than elsewhere. |
|
◊ 2012-06-21 20:32 |
I would never drive in those cars! ![]() |
|
◊ 2012-06-22 12:34 |
It's absolutely o.k. as a rental car for some days in vacations for example. For that purpose I had such a Swift, in 1993 on Corfu/Greece. The damages it had were caused by the bad treatment of the rental car company, not by the car itself. And not to forget: not for the first time the ADAC-statistics has found out, that Suzuki and Subaru have the most satisfied customers. ![]() |
|
◊ 2012-06-22 14:42 |
It sounds very promising, but i'll stay with vintage American cars ![]() |
|
◊ 2012-06-23 16:42 |
So that's not your wedding car, I presume? /vehicle.php?id=269972 |
|
◊ 2012-06-27 15:36 |
absolutely not, rather this one: /vehicle_486321-Chevrolet-Impala-1973.html |
— Made for: 
![1985 Pontiac Firefly [SA310]](/i177492.jpg)

![[Image: valentine3qe9.623.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/th0is179/valentine3qe9.623.jpg)




.gif)


.gif)
absolutely not, rather this one: