Class: Cars, Off-road / SUV — Model origin: — Built in:
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2008-04-15 23:59 |
2002 BMW X5 4.6is (it’s the haul ass version) though that’s the only thing it can do is haul ass ... ![]() -- Last edit: 2008-04-15 23:59:58 |
◊ 2008-04-16 00:01 |
What's the point of having fast SUVs anyway? They're just going to end up rolling over. |
◊ 2008-04-16 00:06 |
I have no clue why car companies build fast SUVs or why people buy them. -- Last edit: 2009-03-03 01:27:06 |
◊ 2008-04-16 21:32 |
An X5 handles better than lots of saloons- def not a rollover |
◊ 2008-04-16 23:06 |
Oh you could certainly roll it over, trust me. It would be very easy to do. |
◊ 2008-04-17 23:18 |
well, tiff needell on fifth gear thrashed one(and no one thrashes cars like he does) on a twisty tight track - no rollover and here's vicky BH trying to rollover http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFahKHx6j0c -- Last edit: 2008-04-18 01:05:18 |
◊ 2008-04-18 05:57 |
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo I think is the fastest suv. I like them but I suppose that it's pointles to have an suv with 500+ horsepower and a top speed over 165 mph. |
◊ 2008-04-20 01:34 |
They were racing those Hyped-up SUVs around a race track. That does not constitute real world driving. Try making an unplanned abrupt emergency maneuver with a BMW X5 at high speed and see what happens ... ![]() (Above) 2002 BMW X5 4.6is -- Last edit: 2008-04-20 01:36:04 |
◊ 2009-09-29 03:30 |
The X5 and the Cayenne have a level of sportiness that no traditonal SUVs can match. So due to that sportiness they are to some degree living up to the BMW and Porsche image. I understand that many say that just by the fact of them being SUVs they don't deserve to be BMWs or Porsches. -- Last edit: 2009-09-29 03:32:47 |