1962 GMC C-Series
1962 GMC C-Series in The Mod Squad, TV Series, 1968-1973
Ep. 3.17
Class: Cars, Chassis Cab — Model origin:

Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase
Comments about this vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2015-03-16 14:33 |
'62 or '63. |
◊ 2015-03-16 18:21 |
GMC 2500?? |
◊ 2015-03-17 00:14 |
As chassis-cab, it could be a 115"/2.92 m wheelbase ½-ton 1000, a 127"/3.23 m wheelbase ¾-ton 1500 (and maybe a "long 1000" with the same specs, to be confirmed) or a 133"/3.38 m wb 1-ton 2500. Or maybe a 133" 1½-ton 3000 (1960-62)? Ok, there is little likelihood for this one, as the wheel rims don't fit... May be we should just say 1962 C-Series? -- Last edit: 2015-03-17 00:15:49 |
◊ 2015-03-17 01:06 |
For 1960 through 1962 GMC Model numbers for 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 1.5 ton were 1000, 1500, 2500, and 3000 GMC did not use the "C" nomenclature, C-applied to Chevrolet branded trucks..... -- Last edit: 2015-03-17 01:07:00 |
◊ 2015-03-18 01:28 |
That's what is said in my comment, just above yours? In fact, light-duty 1000 to 2500 "names" (and 3000, etc. for medium- and heavy-duty models) were used from 1960 to 1966. With the discontinuation of the 3000 for the 1963 MY of course. ... and C-Something was only used as GMC "chassis code" from 1967 until mid-seventies, as GMC started to advertise with just 1500, 2500 and 3500 names, for the 1967+ ½-ton to 1-ton models. ![]() ![]() ![]() (1969, 1973 & 1977 brochures) If I'm not mistaken (I followed this IMCDb habit when I started to identify GMC trucks), we just use this C-Series name because: • GMC had a K-Series from 1960 onward, so it's easier to refer to an unidentifiable model as a C/K-Series one, the same way it's done for the equivalent Chevrolet models, • if C/K-Series, then one part of it is "logically" C-Series, all the more when the truck has obviously not (or just wasn't sold with) a four-wheel drive powertrain. It can be indeed seen as a inaccurate shortcut, but it's mostly useful to identify these trucks. Or should we call them GMC No-series? ![]() -- Last edit: 2015-03-18 01:47:23 |
◊ 2015-03-18 02:15 |
Now, the bigger question is how do they classify them between 2 by 4 and 4 by 4 drive system on this GMC division? ![]() |
◊ 2015-03-18 02:56 |
he two-wheel-drive versions had the "C" prefix and came in the half-ton C10 and C15 (long bed), the three-quarter-ton C20 and the one-ton C30. Four-wheel-drive models had a "K" prefix and were called K10, K15 and K20. There was no four-wheel-drive version of the one-ton pickup and hence no K30. GMC models were called 1000/K1000, 1500/K1500 and 2500, with the K signifying four-wheel drive. got this from http://www.edmunds.com/gmc/sierra-1500/history.html . i know its not my discussion but it might help. if not, sorry... |
◊ 2015-03-18 13:20 |
Good answer, Baube ![]() |
◊ 2015-03-23 05:14 |
This discussion doesn't belong to anyone. Or better said, it belongs to everybody: welcome into it, and let's argue so we can all learn more and more ![]() This said, I'm afraid your source is somewhat wrong about some details, Baube: • first of all, this truck line started in 1960 and not 1962 as written in the article ! The trucks had a new hood in 1962 (and a new grille, for Chevrolet models), but the lower part of the cowl remained the same... • the article says that for Chevrolet the C-Something model numbers nomenclature began in 1962, but it really started from 1960 onward, with C-14 (short) and C-15 (long) for the ½-ton model, C-25 for the ¾-ton and C-36 for the 1-ton. But don't forget it was written that way only in the brochures, as trucks had an emblem saying Apache 10, 20, 30 or 40 (or Viking 50 & 60, Spartan 70 & 80); • for 1962, the "visible name" of the trucks was just 10; 20 and so on; • the C-10 / C-20 / C-30 names started only from 1963 onward. There was then no longer any C/K-15 as the long ½-ton truck was called C-10 too. • forgotten by your source: the 1960-62 1½-ton Chevrolet C-40 / GMC 3000 with the light-duty cab, but used only as stake and chassis-cab. • another small oversight: the GMC and the Chevrolet models are said to just have slight differences in grill and taillight design, but the engines were different, including a V6 for the GMC models. I didn't read more than the part about the 1st generation of C/K-Series, but I'm not really confident about the report on the following generations of C/K ![]() But I just wonder why we do repeat these names again and again in this page: I explained it once (but it wasn't clear enough, obviously), then supcoach said it again, and I had to repeat it with more details, then Baube did it (with some errors ![]() I thought the way Chevrolet and GMC managed the name of these trucks was well known, as one can easily find enough informations about it to make cross-references and avoid mistakes. As far as I know, the IMCDb contributors and admins follow more or less precisely the GM way of doing (except for some "off-road habits" like the 1960-66 GMC C-Series used for consistency and, above all, easiness), so is there anything that I am missing here? (Its a true question: with the translation, I may have misunderstood something in the discussion ![]() -- Last edit: 2015-03-23 05:25:55 |
◊ 2015-03-23 05:50 |
well, i'm far from expert when it goes to chassis-cab and GM's options list for C/K is probably thicker than a phone book ( well maybe not that far but i can ask, i know somebody who bought his 3rd Silverado last year ). i recognize that it might have some errors as internet is full of articles and i picked the one that had the more sense to me. looks like what i found doesn't help. would be so much simple if somebody at GM would had take 5 mins of his time to find a name for the Chevy and one for the GMC instead of losing about everybody in those "c something, k that" thing. i'm staying away from pickup trucks now, unless its a regular one.....probably i did not really understood the whole thing because i'm not expert in chassis-cab. all i know is that they exist, they look like a pick-up truck ( or a E series/Savana/Express). calling it C when RWD and K when 4X4 is probably the good thing to do |