unknown
unknown in 71 Fragmente einer Chronologie des Zufalls, Movie, 1994
Class: Cars, Hatchback
01:33:18 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2011-06-24 07:55 |
![[Image: 310214-BER_DB.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0ge31/310214-BER_DB.jpg) ![[Image: 310215-BER_DC.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0ge31/310215-BER_DC.jpg) |
|
◊ 2011-06-24 20:37 |
Something faceless and confusable from the 80ies. A Lateef-car.  |
|
◊ 2011-06-25 10:57 |
Nissan Micra [K10] ? |
|
◊ 2011-06-26 17:43 |
It does have a face, it's just blurred in this picture  I'm deeply offended.. definitely not my kind of car  where'd you get that idea -- Last edit: 2011-06-26 17:43:29 |
|
◊ 2011-06-26 17:44 |
My first thought was Opel Corsa [A] |
|
◊ 2011-06-26 17:51 |
@Lateef: boxy shape, 80ies, plastic bumpers, this gave me that impression. I disagree with your first sentence. Does Datsun Stanza, Talbot Solara, Morris Ital, Alfa Arna, Toyota Carina II have faces? No. They have not. To the car: Citroen AX maybe? |
|
◊ 2011-06-26 18:04 |
Ford Escort MkIV? |
|
◊ 2011-06-26 22:16 |
Those aren't really my kind of cars. That is, I do not want to be synonymous with those cars. I like those cars, but they aren't on the top of my list. I'm actually more of a fan of larger cars with rounded bodies, such as the Ford Scorpio, Nissan Leopard, Mazda 929, Opel Senator, Renault Safrane, Buick Park Avenue, Chrysler Concorde, Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight) Now this here's a matter of opinion. It's not something absolute. You'd decide whether a car has a face or not. Now I do not want to get on your bad sides, but what makes the K70 a 100 times better? I cannot put my finger on it. Is it the chromed bumpers? |
|
◊ 2011-06-27 16:42 |
Now that's an interesting question  (though that it will lead to one more off-topic discussion involving Ingo, but I start to be used to these  ) |
|
◊ 2011-06-28 16:44 |
Due lack of time just a short answer, @Lateef: yes, about this question the bumper is extremely important. Plastic bumper-cars are always faceless and irrelevant for me, not many exceptions. Sure, there are a bit confusable chrome bumper-cars, and yes, the front view of the K 70 is slightly confusable with the front of an Audi 100 C1 for example - but the rest is unique. With getting plastic bumpers in the 80ies, many cars became faceless IMO. But it became worse year by year. As we'd talked about it before, an extreme example from nowadays: /vehicle.php?id=189298 Just a few days ago I had the evidence just in front of me. Such a Kia came from the left, turned on the road in front of me and stayed there. So I could see the car from three sides. No, I couldn't identify it immediately, only with a view on the badge. Too many details -to be precise: all- were confusable. Toyota, Opel, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Peugeot, etc., it could hve been everything. |
|
◊ 2014-10-15 18:58 |
And do all of the suggested IDs have vents under the windshield? No. They have not. (I'm talking about Mackster's, Sandie's and Neon's suggestions, not the cars in the quote) -- Last edit: 2014-10-15 18:59:28 |
|
◊ 2014-10-16 20:41 |
Hey, what's about a Seat Ibiza? |
|
◊ 2014-10-16 21:36 |
It has hood vents, but only one wiper arm. |
|
◊ 2025-02-02 11:33 |
Call me crazy but...first gen Suzuki Swift? The rounded shape of the sunroof kind of fits, and could it pass for the version with the flush headlamps? The mounting of the wipers between the cowl vents would also fit. -- Last edit: 2025-02-02 11:34:07 |
|
◊ 2025-02-02 11:59 |
Everything looks to fit from the front indeed. But at the rear, the shape of the rear side window is too angular, and the bootlid looks also too inclined to me  (unless it's a 5dr, but this looks like a 3dr) -- Last edit: 2025-02-02 12:00:50 |
