impdb.org

IGCD

[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Carry on Nurse; The Sorcerers; Driving Lessons; Smile 2; GTMax; Rien ne va plus; For All Mankind; 핸섬가이즈; Peligrosa obsesión; الثلاثة يشتغلونها; The Lord's of Flatbush; Samurai Dick; Турксиб; Better Luck Tomorrow; 내가 죽던 날; (more...)

Mack C-95

Mack C-95 in Emergency!, TV Series, 1972-1978 Ep. 6.11

Class: Trucks, Fire truck — Model origin:

Mack C-95

00:37:23 Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene

Comments about this vehicle

Author	Message
mike962 ◊ 2019-09-23 11:01	isn't this yet another Crown Firecoach ? so why list it?
rjluna2 ◊ 2019-09-24 01:58	I don't see anything indicates Crown Firecoach Engine 116:
Reg1992 ◊ 2019-09-24 02:07	I don't believe this is a Crown Firecoach either.
Pokeoddsponge ◊ 2019-09-28 10:40	Mack?
mike962 ◊ 2019-09-28 11:28	rjluna2 wrote I don't see anything indicates Crown Firecoach Engine 116: if you put stupid behind main pic intead of this.... it's a Mack C-95 -- Last edit: 2019-09-28 11:30:10
Lateef ◊ 2019-09-28 11:42	mike962 wrote if you put stupid behind main pic intead of this.... Enough with your abusive attitude already.
mike962 ◊ 2019-09-28 11:56	Lateef wrote Enough with your abusive attitude already. but is dam true, that side shot is much better and much much more revealing than rear only shot what is so abusive about asking for more attention when submitting something? to be much easier identifiable -- Last edit: 2019-09-28 12:02:27
Lateef ◊ 2019-09-28 12:32	Firstly, the main pic is the best of the bunch (with accompanying thumbs enabling identification) as the pic shows the whole fire truck and not just the cab. It's a better picture in terms of composition. Maybe not the best pic in terms of identification, but this is not a priority. For many, including me, the former is. Just accept the thumbs and be happy with it, don't whine about it and call the uploader's choice a stupid one. Not everyone is wired the same way you are, please have some consideration for how others do it. It is abusive when you feel the need to criticise a certain user's choice of main pic. That's just the way it is. Constructive criticism is one thing, but this is not. You just flat out say it's a stupid main pic and you make it sound very personal. It's much better to say something along the lines of "I would have chosen your first thumb for a mainpic, but this is just my opinion".
rjluna2 ◊ 2019-09-28 16:45	pokeoddsponge wrote Mack? Sounds plausible based on these thumbnails which I provided here, pokeoddsponge. Seems to have the bulldog badge at these sides which mike962 showed us for the comparison
rjluna2 ◊ 2019-09-28 16:48	mike962 wrote if you put stupid behind main pic intead of this.... Mike, I made a choice making a full profile for the main picture based on what I was able to capture here.
mike962 ◊ 2019-09-28 17:42	rjluna2 wrote Mike, I made a choice making a full profile for the main picture based on what I was able to capture here. but trucks and tractors are very bad from rear view only as do forklifts full frontal cos there is no reference points to DI them
tore-40 ◊ 2019-09-28 17:51	Seems to have other wheels compared to the ones in mike's Mack link above
mike962 ◊ 2019-09-28 17:55	tore-40 wrote Seems to have other wheels compared to the ones in mike's Mack link above
tore-40 ◊ 2019-09-28 19:37	That's a better match

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising