Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Bait; Ankle Biters; L'Algérie pays de la qualité; 暴き屋 保険調査裏仕事人; Mr. Monk's Last Case: A Monk Movie; 天涯追兇; שלאגר; 勇闖毒龍潭; Traverse; 不可思議物語 Fantastic Collection; Angel, Angel, Down We Go; あゝ!一軒家プロレス; 30 -thirty-; Death in Brunswick; Tatort - Das Ende der Nacht; (more...)

Rocki Whore Picture Show: A Hardcore Parody, Movie, 2011 IMDB

Pictures provided by: Jale

Display options:

535732Custom Made Harley-Davidson [*][*]
5357331964 Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser [*][*][*]


Where to find this title?

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Comments about this movie

See all comments about this movie and its vehicles

AuthorMessage

Jale PL

◊ 2012-09-28 14:04

 [Image: 6001.64.jpg]

;)

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-28 15:53

 First Stronghold starts adding porn movies, now Jale... Could they be the same person? :think:

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-28 16:11

 or 2-MANN
[Image: identicaltwinsgirls.png]

-- Last edit: 2012-09-28 16:36:11

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-28 16:19

 I've never seen that member. :D

Q-Ball JP

◊ 2012-09-28 16:46

 I thought the Jale was the king of sleazy porn stuffs. Either way, this looks pretty good. I wish I still has my betamax

chicomarx BE

◊ 2012-09-28 19:06
G-MANN wrote First Stronghold starts adding porn movies, now Jale...

Jale was first to introduce 70s porn IIRC, Stronghold wasn't back yet.

tom11

◊ 2012-09-28 21:17
chicomarx wrote
Jale was first to introduce 70s porn IIRC, Stronghold wasn't back yet.

What was the first porn movie added to the sight?

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-28 23:28
G-MANN wrote First Stronghold starts adding porn movies

This stuff is much more recommended here than Hollywood-block busters. Because they aren't cluttered up with boring product placement- and sponsored junk.

chicomarx BE

◊ 2012-09-29 00:16

 As long as there's no XXX in the actual image, my main objection is the titles on the front page. Doesn't look good. What if Michelle Obama visits the site?

atom SE

◊ 2012-09-29 00:20

 /vehicle_83265-Citroen-DS-1969.html

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 00:23
chicomarx wrote What if Michelle Obama visits the site?
:??: What shall be the problem then? Could the say "No electors from IMCDb, please" ?

ElSaxo IT

◊ 2012-09-29 00:26
atom wrote http://imcdb.org/vehicle_83265-Citroen-DS-1969.html

LOL, and as if on purpose, it's also a '69 car. :D

chicomarx BE

◊ 2012-09-29 00:26

 ^^ strictly speaking there's nothing visible, carchasesfanatic explained it well. :D

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 01:06
chicomarx wrote As long as there's no XXX in the actual image, my main objection is the titles on the front page. Doesn't look good. What if Michelle Obama visits the site?
will use as "scissors in the head"
and ask myself:"is it really good enough, to show it to her?" :o

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 01:07:15

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 01:23

 It's just that Jale and Stronghold seem to have very similar taste in movies. It was just a little joke. But I don't really understand this Michelle Obama thing, chicomarx :p

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 01:23:47

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 01:41
andrepa wrote and ask myself:"is it really good enough, to show it to her?" :o

Of course we are good. There's no similar international cluster of cars-in-movies (plus a few other off-topic-things) knowledge anywhere else on the world. The correct question would be: "Are our topics interesting enough for her?"

chicomarx BE

◊ 2012-09-29 01:43

 My point was that explicit porn titles shouldn't be included in 'last completed' where for visitors (12,000/day) it's the first thing they see.

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 01:57

 @chicomarx "But here is the bombshell"
@ingo "But here is where the bombshell is gone"

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:01

 Why that? When porn-interested people see, that just the cars are our topic here, they will leave immediately with the thoughts "Hey, what nerds are trolling around here" - and that will be all. Hiding or not listing the movies just because of ugh-terms in the title would be absoutely pointless, idiotic und embarassing. Not even mentioned the fact, that in every country, in every culture there are wide differences about ugh-terms.
For myself I repudiate to have a scissor in the head for rules/mores in foreign countries.
Yes, sure, of course I mean that for the place here, this internet-forum. When I go abroad in the real life, I surely will be attentive for that.

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:05

 @andrepa: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvQtMcETc0g
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G64IYyVat10

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:06

 For myself, i agree, don´t need scissors in the head, any time geting aware of snares , catching them ;)
avoid delicate subject, by concentrating on our job!


-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 02:09:25

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 02:07

 I didn't know Michelle Obama had a reputation as a prude. But yes, it might not look good to see porn titles in the Last Completed Movie Pages section, especially if there's a bunch of them.

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:12

 on the other hand it is the same thing with german Heimatfilm, it could be misunderstood as well!
but we can´t do without them, next Splattermovies etc.

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 02:14:29

chicomarx BE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:20

 The rule was always "No Porn", that would probably be simplest.

ElSaxo IT

◊ 2012-09-29 02:25
chicomarx wrote The rule was always "No Porn", that would probably be simplest.

Although I'm a bit partisan, I cannot understand the reason of such action. Just for a film title that could mean anything or nothing?

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 02:25

 I remember when this topic was first brought up but I can't remember if it was officially decided that porn shouldn't be allowed. But then rules have never been enforced too strongly on this site anyway...

Also there's the grey area of the kind of movies that sixcyl likes (which he fervently denies is porn) :D

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 02:31:24

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:27

 @ingo how do you know, i spent the whole day listening to those 80ies , now will "have a cigar"
with Pink Floyd, ups, no drugs i guess, either!

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 02:36:24

Jale PL

◊ 2012-09-29 02:28
antp wrote As long that you do not post here images of these details, I do not see the problem to list these if they are real movies and listed by IMDb


( /movie.php?id=73589 )

andrepa DE

◊ 2012-09-29 02:53

 reminds me of /movie.php?id=57345 where it was the other way around!
allways wondered what could be the artistic effect of Madame Bardots opening scene?
then learned Godard simply was forced by the production to install.

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 02:54:50

Andre Malraux

◊ 2012-09-29 13:18

 deleted comment

Andre Malraux

◊ 2012-09-29 13:19

 deleted comment

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 14:21

 I meant stuff like Tinto Brass movies, not Truffaut :p

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 14:29:23

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 18:48
chicomarx wrote The rule was always "No Porn", that would probably be simplest.

Why that? This is an European site with many European members, so there's no reason to have the American scissor in the mind. So beep-words are allowed here, too. This an US-manner, too. The same goes for scene like /vehicle.php?id=336102 (there's a pic with a Volvo from a Swedish movie with a closer angle) and scenes, where alcohol is shown.

Otherwise I'm strictly against scenes, containing real violence, dead persons and so on :o

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 19:12
G-MANN wrote But yes, it might not look good to see porn titles in the Last Completed Movie Pages section, especially if there's a bunch of them.

:??: This is absolutly not understandable. As I wrote above, if anyone clics on this page, he will see, that we only have listed cars and that's it. And don't ignore, that porn- and/or porn-movie-lovers can also be car-enthusiasts. So the titles in the headline may bring us new members.

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 19:12:25

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 19:20

 So Ingo, if at the top of the page there were a bunch of titles like Slutty Girls XII, Nasty Nymphos III, Red Hot Gangbang IV, Rough Sex VI etc. that would look totally fine would it? :p

ingo wrote And don't ignore, that porn- and/or porn-movie-lovers can also be car-enthusiasts.


Oh, of course. We have one or two at IMCDB :whistle:

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 19:24:31

3loader RU

◊ 2012-09-29 19:23

 I am agree that no need to keep adult titles in Last Completed. As music videos. They also not considering lot of cars or long time car action (i mean action of car itself).

Nightrider RU

◊ 2012-09-29 19:24
ingo wrote

Otherwise I'm strictly against scenes, containing real violence, dead persons and so on :o


Did you mean real dead persons?

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 19:25:05

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 19:28

 @G-Mann: I cannot see any problems with that. As we only show the cars. Plus the positive effect, that people, who search the WWW for that specific terms, will come to us due that. When they aren't interested in cars, they will leave immediately. If cars are annother hobby of them, we can get new members, maybe even contributors. Why shall a collector of porn movies not share the contained car-pictures with us? I really cannot understand your logics.

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 19:30:41

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 19:29
Nightrider wrote Did you mean real dead persons?

Yes. But unappetizing movie-scenes, too.

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 19:37

 It would just look a bit seedy, Ingo. I think we're going round in circles now. I don't know why we're getting into a debate about this because it doesn't look like anyone's adding lots of porn titles, it's just been one or two recently. God, I make one little joke and it grows into another interminable discussion :o (about a topic that's been covered many times in the past)

-- Last edit: 2012-09-29 19:40:16

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 19:39

 See my comment from yesterday night at 23:28, why porn and trash movies should be more welcome than Holly- or Bollywood-blockbusters and the next dozens of soap operas, telenovelas etc.
You cannot deny the fact, that very often the trash contains more interesting (o.k.,mainly background) cars than the prim-and-proper premium products.

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-09-29 19:42

 Well, that's only your opinion :p

Andre Malraux

◊ 2012-09-29 19:55

 deleted comment

dsl SX

◊ 2012-09-29 21:13
G-MANN wrote God, I make one little joke ....

Nurse - quick - my pills ......

Ingo DE

◊ 2012-09-29 23:34
G-MANN wrote It would just look a bit seedy, Ingo.

Better: /movie.php?id=89134 ?

antp BE

◊ 2012-10-01 16:51
chicomarx wrote My point was that explicit porn titles shouldn't be included in 'last completed' where for visitors (12,000/day) it's the first thing they see.

I agree with that

ElSaxo wrote Just for a film title that could mean anything or nothing?

It is true that some titles of non-porn non-erotic movies may look like porn-titles anyway:

/movie_1020885-Lesbian-Vampire-Killers.html
/movie_492330-Poltergay.html
(just to cite the two about which I had comments)

G-MANN UK

◊ 2012-10-01 16:53

 Porn titles often tend to be a bit more crude than that.

-- Last edit: 2012-10-01 16:55:58

Add a comment

Advertising