[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Cinq colonnes à la une; My Eyes Are Up Here; ดาวพระศุกร์; Egyszer volt Budán Bödör Gáspár; Lie to Me; 東京ヴァンパイアホテル: 映画版; Secuestro al vuelo 601; Picasso Trigger; 破戰; The Prime Minister Is Missing; Zapomenuté světlo; Hell Squad; クレヨンしんちゃん 嵐を呼ぶ!夕陽のカスカベボーイズ; The In-Laws; Riding High; (more...)

They Shall Not Grow Old, Documentary, 2018 IMDB

Pictures provided by: chicomarx

Display options:

12074071913 Clayton & Shuttleworth 3-Ton Steam Wagon [*]
12074141910 LGOC B-Type [*]
1207410Metropolitan Carriage and Wagon Mark I [*][*]
1207415Metropolitan Carriage and Wagon Mark V [*][*]
1207416Unic 12/14 hp [*]


Where to find this title?

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Comments about this movie

See all comments about this movie and its vehicles

AuthorMessage

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-24 19:18

 Any objections to this documentary? It did have a cinematic release. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cSXfKSRKz4

mike962 DE

◊ 2018-11-24 19:57
chicomarx wrote Any objections to this documentary? It did have a cinematic release. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cSXfKSRKz4

haven't we enough of this shit already ?

hee some examples

/movie_481303-World-War-I-in-Colour.html

/movie_3638584-Apocalypse-La-1ere-guerre-mondiale.html

-- Last edit: 2018-11-24 19:59:17

johnfromstaffs EN

◊ 2018-11-24 21:52

 ^ There are a great many entries in this database that do not interest me in the least, but I refrain from pejorative comments since they may interest other people. Do you use such phrases in normal conversation?

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-25 01:12

 He'd probably use Scheiße. It can be deleted if there are objections, mike962 aside, but this is a cut above the usual straight-to-DVD documentary.
It will be released in the US next month.

dsl SX

◊ 2018-11-25 02:01

 If there is a credible chance that someone out there might see the film and be curious about its vehicle content, we should be providing the answers - it's what we're here for. So I would accept this film.

But on the same argument I would also accept Robi's documentary about Munich from a week or two back - the principle is the same.

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-25 02:21

 I knew this would happen... Documentaries we review case by case, we can not accept everything put on film. The Munich footage doesn't meet the rules.
"Die Produktionsfirma "Filmwerte" aus Babelsberg durfte im Münchner Stadtarchiv stöbern und hat für die Reihe "Historische Filmschätze" München mit zum Teil bisher unveröffentlichtem Videomaterial wiederentdeckt."
So they delved in the local archive and produced a DVD about the city.

This doesn't meet the rule "car related" either, but it is widely seen.

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-25 02:33

 If night cub is here he can say yes or no on this.

dsl SX

◊ 2018-11-25 02:55

 You've got a Clayton & Shuttleworth, so deleting this entry would be illegal under EU legislation as ratified by Maggie under the Basingstoke Convention.

As for the Munich question, it's the sort of decision-making which illustrates why I've deliberately avoided any opening to become a validating admin.

mike962 DE

◊ 2018-11-25 10:53

 why not just settle it once for and for all ???

docus no longer allowed unless they subject are the vehicle themselves !!!


for example this focuses directly about the vehicles , they are not just some random footage where they appear

/movie_1004513713-Tanks!-Evolution-of-a-Legend.html

what exactly would wrong with this aproach ??

-- Last edit: 2018-11-25 10:56:26

johnfromstaffs EN

◊ 2018-11-25 14:39

 So we are restricted to modern output where the subjects of our interest are drawn from a restricted set of “available for hire” vehicles?

If I may speak for myself, it would be as lacking in interest as ploughing through boxed sets of “Minder” or “Matlock” or sloppily drawn cartoons, of which we see far too many.

-- Last edit: 2018-11-25 16:05:05

mike962 DE

◊ 2018-11-25 17:44

 no, there would be not stuck to modern output as docus often use archieve footage

-- Last edit: 2018-11-25 17:44:37

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-25 18:42

 Mike, you don't get to comment on contributions, that's the job of only a few highly qualified admins.
walter, atom, night cub, Sandie, G-Mann (if he's still here)... Your name doesn't appear on that list.

mike962 DE

◊ 2018-11-25 18:56
chicomarx wrote Mike, you don't get to comment on contributions, that's the job of only a few highly qualified admins.
walter, atom, night cub, Sandie, G-Mann (if he's still here)... Your name doesn't appear on that list.

neither johnfromstaffs !! so why the double standars ?

chicomarx BE

◊ 2018-11-25 19:03

 He writes thoughtful comments, you write "haven't we enough of this shit?", that's the difference.
You're also the first to comment on robi's films /movie.php?id=1004519811 which isn't necessary.

mike962 DE

◊ 2018-11-25 19:07

 by shit I describe both the war as being totally pointless slaughterhouse that should have never been in the first palce and that we already have bunch of "docus" about it where of course near same vehicles over and over , do we ned to lsit every dam documentary ever made about ww1 and ww2 ? it's not like magicaly real new footage will show up out of a magic hat

-- Last edit: 2018-11-25 19:09:16

Add a comment

You must login to post comments...

Advertising