Advertising Last completed movie pages
2002 Jaguar X-Type [X400] Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2007-04-12 23:29 |
to the main admin: this is a 2002 jaguar x-type not a xj8 you might have gotten a little confused there .gif ";)") -- Last edit: 2007-04-12 23:29:37 |
|
◊ 2007-04-12 23:43 |
Why "main admin" ?  There are many other admins here, and that's not me that labelled that one  |
|
◊ 2007-04-13 01:36 |
hmm, I believe it is quite impossible from this angle on such bad picture to tell the difference.. |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 00:16 |
sorry about that i though u was the main admin here on this site. because u told me that on the bad boys2 jaguar xj40 page |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 00:18 |
it's an x-type! not an xj8 |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 00:20 |
I am the "main admin" (else I would not have replied when you ask to the "main admin") but I am not the only admin here, and for sure not the only one that add vehicles (else I would not have time left for sleeping  ) |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 00:39 |
I repeat it again (hope for the last time..) - on this picture and from this angle it is impossible to see the difference.. JAG XJ12 - prove that it is X-Type and not XJ8 and I will change it right now.. From the plot (as I was the one who added this picture & vehicle) - it belongs to rich guy and in Fastlane is a lot of fancy and expensive vehicles, so I do not see any point in sitting rich guy into entry model of Jaguar.. |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 06:41 |
I'm tempted to say it's an X-Type. The XJ's headlights seem to be rounder, compared to the more oval shaped lights on the X-Type (and, IMO, on this car). |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 15:45 |
finnaly someone agrees with me! |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 16:31 |
http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2000-2003/2002-Jaguar-X-Type-1280x960.jpg vs. http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2004/2004-Jaguar-XJ8-1280x960.jpg pity, that we can not see the door handles.. I left the decision for the others, I think it is impossible to decide. |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 16:50 |
At first sight I would maybe have said X-Type (but do not forget that I am often wrong for these ) but now I think that headlights would be smaller if it was a X-Type. They should also all be nearly the same size, no? |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 19:39 |
That is most certainly an X-type. It curves at the back like a mini s-type, much unlike the XJ |
|
◊ 2007-04-14 23:22 |
the XJ goes back to the 1980's XJ6 S3. im referring to the rear taillights of the XJ |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
— Made for: 
![2002 Jaguar X-Type [X400]](i094700.jpg)
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
