We encounter some technical problems with the database, hence the error messages about "too many connections", requiring to wait few minutes and reload pages. Sorry for the inconvenience, we are trying to solve that. See this topic of the forum for discussion about that problem.
Publicité Dernières fiches de films complétées
1971 Dodge Charger 
Catégorie : Voitures, Coupé — Origine du modèle : 
01:12:08 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Véhicule dans une action mineure ou utilisé juste dans une courte scène
Commentaires sur ce véhicle| Auteur | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 11-10-2004 à 21:10
|
01-12-08 Va se faire écraser |
|
◊ 17-12-2004 à 00:52
|
normal car : quiconque défigure un chef d'oeuvre comme celui la, avec une couleur comme celle la, est un salopard et mérite de ce faire buter ! ha ha ! ça ne vous rapelle rien ?? |
|
◊ 2005-12-28 18:25
|
What happens after the picture above: Another one much earlier, maybe the same:  |
|
◊ 2006-06-15 00:46
|
This car is not a 72. It is a 71 Charger with a stripe pattern unique to this car. How do i know it's a 71? The side-marker lights changed from 71-72, and those are the 71 lights. Also, the 71 R/T had the two-vertical-scoop doors. No other year had those doors. For 72, they went with 5 stamped depressions stacked vertically on the front of the doors, available only on the "Rallye" Chargers, which replaced the R/Ts. But this car is also kind-of a mut, as it has the R/T-style doors and Rally wheels, but no R/T grille, hood, or emblems. It's got me a little puzzled. |
|
◊ 2006-06-15 00:47
|
And if you look really closely in the picture, there looks to be another 1971 Charger parked against the curb in the background behind the van. |
|
Explorer4X4 ◊ 2006-06-15 00:49
|
 The van behind it is a Dodge Sportsman/Plymouth Voyager and behind that is either another Charger or a Pontiac LeMans/GTO. |
|
◊ 2006-06-25 19:12
|
This looks more like a 1973 because its headlights are the same as the 1973 ones. |
|
◊ 2006-10-17 01:47
|
That car is not a 73. The 1973s had different doors, different back windows, different grilles, and different side marker lights. It's a 71, trust me. |
|
◊ 2006-10-22 08:18
|
IT's a '71. I know cause I own one. It's the only year for those divided marker lights. |
|
◊ 2007-02-11 21:12
|
It had a sweet paint job! |
|
◊ 2007-09-24 21:59
|
On the 71, anybody notice that the rear wheels are not Rallye wheels like the front, but some kind of "one off", maybe even steel wheels painted hillbilly chrome? The Charger (and I'm pretty sure it is one) behind the van looks like a 73 to me. I spent about 20 minutes watching and rewatching the DVD and I'm pretty sure it's a more basic model of the 73, black vinyl top, but not the full top like the "SE" model would have gotten (plus the "SE" had window louvers on the rear quarter windows). The grill, marker lights, and body shape all make it look like a Charger to me, the way the vinyl top is attached and the way the window openings look tell me it must be a 73 or 74, and since the movie was made in 74, I'm guessing it is a 73 since it doesn't look brand new. The only confusing part to me is the color, it's not a high impact color and I don't think I've ever seen a light yellow color for an old Mopar, guess I'll have to check the color codes for that year. If anybody gets a better look at this car on a high def or big screen, please give me some feedback. I've owned three 73 Chargers and I'm really curious to know if I'm right. |
|
◊ 2007-10-11 03:51
|
It was horrible that they crushed one of the best cars |
|
◊ 2007-11-17 17:27
|
"Lady get outta the street" |
|
◊ 2009-10-31 23:22
|
the 68's and 69's were better |
Ajouter un commentaire
