Comments about this vehicle

Author	Message
antp ◊ 2004-10-11 21:10	Crushed by a refuse truck: Seen earlier: -- Last edit: 2014-04-02 19:17:48 (karoomay)
mc leod ◊ 2004-12-17 00:52	normal car : quiconque défigure un chef d'oeuvre comme celui la, avec une couleur comme celle la, est un salopard et mérite de ce faire buter ! ha ha ! ça ne vous rapelle rien ??
Moparguy1973 ◊ 2006-06-15 00:46	This car is not a 72. It is a 71 Charger with a stripe pattern unique to this car. How do i know it's a 71? The side-marker lights changed from 71-72, and those are the 71 lights. Also, the 71 R/T had the two-vertical-scoop doors. No other year had those doors. For 72, they went with 5 stamped depressions stacked vertically on the front of the doors, available only on the "Rallye" Chargers, which replaced the R/Ts. But this car is also kind-of a mut, as it has the R/T-style doors and Rally wheels, but no R/T grille, hood, or emblems. It's got me a little puzzled.
Moparguy1973 ◊ 2006-06-15 00:47	And if you look really closely in the picture, there looks to be another 1971 Charger parked against the curb in the background behind the van.
explorer4x4 ◊ 2006-06-15 00:49	antp wrote The van behind it is a Dodge Sportsman/Plymouth Voyager and behind that is either another Charger or a Pontiac LeMans/GTO.
trucker ◊ 2006-06-25 19:12	This looks more like a 1973 because its headlights are the same as the 1973 ones.
Moparguy1973 ◊ 2006-10-17 01:47	That car is not a 73. The 1973s had different doors, different back windows, different grilles, and different side marker lights. It's a 71, trust me.
dwc43 ◊ 2006-10-22 08:18	IT's a '71. I know cause I own one. It's the only year for those divided marker lights.
no1Uno ◊ 2007-02-11 21:12	It had a sweet paint job!
mopar-or-nocar ◊ 2007-09-24 21:59	On the 71, anybody notice that the rear wheels are not Rallye wheels like the front, but some kind of "one off", maybe even steel wheels painted hillbilly chrome? The Charger (and I'm pretty sure it is one) behind the van looks like a 73 to me. I spent about 20 minutes watching and rewatching the DVD and I'm pretty sure it's a more basic model of the 73, black vinyl top, but not the full top like the "SE" model would have gotten (plus the "SE" had window louvers on the rear quarter windows). The grill, marker lights, and body shape all make it look like a Charger to me, the way the vinyl top is attached and the way the window openings look tell me it must be a 73 or 74, and since the movie was made in 74, I'm guessing it is a 73 since it doesn't look brand new. The only confusing part to me is the color, it's not a high impact color and I don't think I've ever seen a light yellow color for an old Mopar, guess I'll have to check the color codes for that year. If anybody gets a better look at this car on a high def or big screen, please give me some feedback. I've owned three 73 Chargers and I'm really curious to know if I'm right.
Kenster102.5 ◊ 2007-10-11 03:51	It was horrible that they crushed one of the best cars
Q-Ball ◊ 2007-11-17 17:27	"Lady get outta the street"
BiltFordTuff ◊ 2009-10-31 23:22	Kenster102.5 wrote It was horrible that they crushed one of the best cars the 68's and 69's were better
no1Uno ◊ 2011-02-13 04:32	I like the '71s better, I really like the paint job on this one, a shame what they did to it
Game-oholic 94 ◊ 2012-11-27 22:08	I find it amazing how this car made that E-brake turn, and then came to a stop [snap fingers] just like that; no rolling backwards, or anything. It just turned, and then stopped.
Razor440 ◊ 2016-04-05 22:06	Was Halicki an anti-Mopar guy or something? Seemed to wreck a couple of pretty nice B-Bodies in this movie.
no1Uno ◊ 2016-05-20 06:06	I don't know, he did use a Dodge Magnum in his other movie
Razor440 ◊ 2016-07-31 03:50	no1uno wrote I don't know, he did use a Dodge Magnum in his other movie For it to be blown up by a grenade. What did a late 70's smog car ever do to him?
no1Uno ◊ 2017-05-04 22:55	moparguy1973 wrote This car is not a 72. It is a 71 Charger with a stripe pattern unique to this car. How do i know it's a 71? The side-marker lights changed from 71-72, and those are the 71 lights. Also, the 71 R/T had the two-vertical-scoop doors. No other year had those doors. For 72, they went with 5 stamped depressions stacked vertically on the front of the doors, available only on the "Rallye" Chargers, which replaced the R/Ts. But this car is also kind-of a mut, as it has the R/T-style doors and Rally wheels, but no R/T grille, hood, or emblems. It's got me a little puzzled. In the earlier scene-before the custom paint if you look at it closely it has a factory looking rear spoiler (watch the scene in slow motion) the custom paint job Charger has no spoiler and a black trunk, so if its the same Charger they put another trunk on without a spoiler. Also it doesn't have R/T doors look close theres no scoops its just part of the custom paint. -- Last edit: 2017-05-04 23:12:50
Fluttershy ◊ 2020-08-27 05:05	Razor440 wrote Was Halicki an anti-Mopar guy or something? Seemed to wreck a couple of pretty nice B-Bodies in this movie. He bought these cars for a Few Hundred Each at an Auction, If you watch further he Wrecks quite a few Caddies too (More than Planned)
Fluttershy ◊ 2020-08-27 05:07	no1uno wrote In the earlier scene-before the custom paint if you look at it closely it has a factory looking rear spoiler (watch the scene in slow motion) the custom paint job Charger has no spoiler and a black trunk, so if its the same Charger they put another trunk on without a spoiler. Also it doesn't have R/T doors look close theres no scoops its just part of the custom paint. I dont think tjats the Paintjob i think those are Tape Stripes Added just to make it look like a different vehicle

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

1971 Dodge Charger

1971 Dodge Charger in Gone in 60 Seconds, Movie, 1974

Comments about this vehicle

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising