1936 Ford V8 De Luxe Cabriolet [68]

1936 Ford V8 De Luxe [68] in Maxie, Movie, 1985 IMDB

Class: Cars, Convertible — Model origin: US

1936 Ford V8 De Luxe Cabriolet [68]

[*][*][*][*] Vehicle used a lot by a main character or for a long time 

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

Jale PL

2019-07-16 09:14

[Image: 5923.7.jpg] [Image: 5972.1.jpg] [Image: 5925.6.jpg] [Image: 5928.3.jpg] [Image: 5939.3.jpg] [Image: 5949.2.jpg] [Image: 5950.2.jpg] [Image: 5947.4.jpg]

tore-40 NO

2019-07-16 10:01

I think the Convertible was just Convertible, Convertible Sedan was a 4-door convertible?

Anyway, this would rather be a Roadster, with different windshield and doors visible. Optional rumble seat

tore-40 NO

2019-07-16 10:27

Note to whoever just edited without leaving a comment: Is it not a Roadster then?

opal TH

2019-07-16 10:55

Looking simple, they either list as Convertible, Cabriolet, Roadster or Convertible Club Cabriolet.
/vehicle_898199-Ford-V8-De-Luxe-1936.html
/vehicle_256027-Ford-V8-De-Luxe-1936.html
/vehicle_24065-Ford-V8-De-Luxe-68-1936.html
/vehicle_41834-Ford-V8-De-Luxe-68-1936.html

-- Last edit: 2019-07-16 10:59:09

tore-40 NO

2019-07-16 11:07

Yes. Convertible Cabriolet (I think you have an extra comma there), add Club to the name and the seats are all under the hood, the Roadster has special items like doors and windhield, a two seater, available with an optional rumble seat (we used to call it, translated directly, a mother-in-law seat :D)

johnfromstaffs EN

2019-07-16 12:18

What is thumb #5?

tore-40 NO

2019-07-16 13:41

@jfs, I'm not sure I understand your question, one answer would be the best possible view to tell a Roadster from a Convertible Cabriolet

johnfromstaffs EN

2019-07-16 13:56

It’s a different car from the other pictures, without explanation.

s13a LT

2019-07-16 14:30

If you are thinking about those hood louvres, it is because from that side they are angled to the driver's side.

tore-40 NO

2019-07-16 14:34

Lighter colour may be due to a filter effect, painted rims may be just reflections

johnfromstaffs EN

2019-07-16 15:14

Those were the two points I had in mind, but if that’s the reason, fine.

Add a comment

Advertising