Advertising Last completed movie pages
1960 Siam di Tella 1500 [ADO9R] Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: 
— Built in: 
— Made for: 
![1960 Siam di Tella 1500 [ADO9R]](i336268.jpg)
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2010-10-15 11:01 |
SIAM-Di Tella or Morris Fordor? |
|
◊ 2010-10-15 13:38 |
Agree Austin A55 Cambridge-based, so Di Tella or whatever made-for local version. UK origin. |
|
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2010-10-15 19:30 |
no, not british, impossible to be a SIAM or Di Tella. Its a north american car. -- Last edit: 2010-10-15 19:30:13 |
|
◊ 2010-10-15 19:44 |
?? I'm sure the image is just too flat... |
|
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2010-10-15 19:47 |
Yes, sure, not very good image, but its an american car... i don't know Moreover, the vast majority of Di Tella and the like, were taxis, and this has nothing to identify it as a taxi. It has to be some order of the decade from 1960 or earlier American -- Last edit: 2011-01-30 00:54:15 |
|
◊ 2010-10-15 19:49 |
For a milisecond I thought bout a Borgward P100, but it isn't one. |
|
◊ 2010-10-15 20:44 |
I suppose we can all agree it's not a Corcel anyway. |
|
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2010-10-16 00:39 |
None brazilian cars here, until 1990. Look at the rear fenders. It is very rare, in my opinion. But it has all the earmarks of being American. |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 09:35 |
I'm sorry, I don't agree. Allowing for the wrong ratio, to me this is unmistakeably ADO9 based. |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 12:47 |
I'm thinking the same. If most were taxis locally, it does not stop a few being non-taxis. |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 19:24 |
Why must it be a taxi? For me the roof is lighter due light-reflections, not yellow painted. |
|
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2010-10-16 19:51 |
not understand it? the vast majority were taxis, but did not say that this is the case. Although it appears that had a roof bicolor |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 19:53 |
I see a taxi sign on the roof. Mind my eyes have failed me a lot recently. |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 20:30 |
Is your flat cap too loose? |
|
◊ 2010-10-16 20:34 |
The "taxi sign" is rather the head of a soldier behind the car. You see the rifle, too. |
|
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2010-10-16 20:44 |
 not a taxi sign in the car. And yes ingo, it's a soldier, policeman or gendarmerie, i suppose. |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
