Advertising Last completed movie pages
2000 Ford Transit MkIV Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2008-07-08 22:29 |
Is Alexander still around here for identifying this one?  |
|
◊ 2008-07-09 21:47 |
Antoine, do you have any idea of the size of the truck? If it's 7.5 tonne gross, which by the rear overhang it might be, I'd bet on it being Japanese - only Japanese trucks have rear wheels as small as that. |
|
◊ 2008-07-09 22:50 |
No more of it is seen. I would have said that it is smaller than that but indeed the rear overhang may imply such truck. -- Last edit: 2008-07-09 22:50:47 |
|
◊ 2008-07-10 13:51 |
Impossible de reconnaitre ça, on ne peut au mieux que reconnaitre le constructeur de la caisse. Du camion on ne voit qu'une roue arrière, c'est très inssuffisant. |
|
◊ 2008-07-10 22:26 |
bah pourquoi pas ? /vehicle.php?id=141728 /movie.php?id=388318#Comment349075 |
|
◊ 2008-07-12 15:57 |
Yes, don't worry, I am hard to get rid off! I am short on time at the moment, but will try my best. |
|
◊ 2008-07-13 12:07 |
I guess I have to compile a truck wheel rim collection for my own reference ... it is quite hard to find good photos for comparison. This one is, I am fairly sure, a small truck of the 3.5 to 5 ton class. I can rule out quite a few and my best solution is a Ford Transit, sixth generation (2000-2006). I will try to find a real one with double rear wheels in the streets to proof or disproof my idea. |
|
◊ 2008-07-13 15:29 |
I'm not saying you're wrong, Alex - I wouldn't dare .gif ":)") - but so far as I know Transit Mk.VIs don't come with twin rears; like most 3.5 tonne chassis these days they have single rears with 9-ply tyres - unlike the Mk.III I drove for about a quarter of a million miles back in the 80s/90s. |
|
◊ 2008-07-13 18:55 |
Rare, but available, usually as the 'FT 350':![[Image: na51uzs1n1b8543f3eq2.6240.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is293/na51uzs1n1b8543f3eq2.6240.jpg) |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
00:23:58 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
