Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2007-08-05 17:19 |
1969 Chevrolet Impala. |
◊ 2007-08-05 20:08 |
I agree |
◊ 2007-08-06 13:07 |
The classic Wiking N-gauge set -- Last edit: 2007-08-06 13:16:31 |
◊ 2007-08-06 13:09 |
License is 1968. |
◊ 2007-08-06 15:31 |
License may be 1968, but the Chevy is a 1969. Big difference between the two years. |
◊ 2007-08-06 16:22 |
Big dave is correct, it's still listed as a 1968 but it's a 1969. |
◊ 2007-08-07 09:09 |
But I thought license information overrules other information? |
◊ 2007-08-09 07:49 |
The 1969 models were already produced and sold in September 1968 but they were still 1969 models. My 1965 Buick was produced in November 1964 but it isn't a 1964... The year where the car is sold/registered has no importance. It's the model year that counts! My 1991 Buick was first licensed in 1994. I don't know why it took so long but the model is still 1991... And movie cars often have fake plates. They used my 1965 Buick in a small movie and they glued red 1966 license plate reproductions that were made of plastic over the current plates! Back then, here in Quebec (and in other US states or canadian provinces), they used to change the license plates every year on every car and since the action was supposed to take place in 1966, all cars there had 1966 plates. On this shot, you can see that it's starting to fall and the real license plate is visible under it! |
◊ 2007-08-09 10:34 |
Depends on how obvious the information is. If this is a 1968, it must be the only 1968 produced with a 1969 body on it. |
◊ 2007-08-09 14:19 |
It is the opposite. Licence information is especially used when year cannot be determined accurately (e.g. if we only have a range). |
◊ 2007-08-09 19:32 |
Oh, then we should check a couple of Dutch cars... |
◊ 2011-06-07 14:56 |
Sport Sedan. |
◊ 2013-04-20 21:27 |
-- Last edit: 2013-04-21 01:00:35 (Neon) |
◊ 2013-04-20 21:31 |
Thumbnails provided by police car fan shows that this one is equip with 6-cylinder engine. So, model 16339. |